// #d&d — 2015-05-10
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
00:18:39 <Brunius|M> !throw 1d2
00:18:40 <diebot> Brunius|M, 1d2: [1d2=1] 1
00:26:59 <Steven> alrighty, been awake for a couple hours.. i think its time for a nap.
01:17:59 <Avatar> were you not sure how extra grit works
01:26:48 <Mekkis>
01:37:32 <Steven> i didnt make it to sleep.
03:03:08 steven has quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
03:07:59 Gamera has quit (Quit: )
03:19:08 <Avatar`> sleeping is easy
03:27:51 <Steven> suppose so.
03:28:54 <Avatar> where's your confidence
03:31:35 steven ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
03:33:41 steven is now known as Steven1
03:38:08 Steven2 ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
03:38:08 Steven2 is now known as steven
03:39:38 <Avatar> hello phul I am zuul
03:39:41 Steven1 has quit (Ping timeout: 122 seconds)
03:40:10 steven is now known as Steven1
03:44:57 <Avatar> did you win
03:58:21 <Steven> sup
03:58:57 <Avatar> where 'ave you been
03:59:09 <Avatar> I knew something was missing in here
03:59:14 <Avatar> couldn't quite place my finger on it
04:17:52 <Steven> meh
04:33:57 <Mekkis> Steven, did you chase the Brune away?!
04:33:59 <Mekkis> :'(
04:34:10 <steven> so first part of the game seems to be going really quite well...
04:34:11 <Steven> sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.
04:34:23 <Steven> plus he knows i was foolin
04:34:35 <Steven> sorry man, i have been pretty sick.
04:34:36 <Mekkis> )':
04:46:36 <Mekkis> Brunius!!
04:46:45 <Brunius> what
04:46:48 <Steven> see
04:47:10 <Brunius> fuck you steve
04:47:16 <Steven> heh
04:47:53 <Steven> gettin so much milage out of that.
05:08:01 <steven> 51/64 spells left.
05:12:49 <diebot> just fyi, Brunius does have access to my logs. He sees all this stuff.
05:18:00 <Steven> thats cool.
05:21:08 <Avatar> what's wrong
05:21:14 <Avatar> sick of mekkis ?
05:27:31 <Mekkis> which game?
05:35:43 <steven> part 5 of Reign of Winter.
05:36:04 <steven> 12 rounds of combat...
05:36:17 <steven> we've killed approdimently 175 people.
05:37:21 <steven> there have been 2 earthquake spells and a stampeed of 10 ankylosaurus
05:37:44 <Mekkis> ah. Please don't go into more detail: I'm still in the second book :)
05:38:19 <Mekkis> Can you help me decide which direction I should take my red mantis assassin?
05:38:38 <steven> i wont go into any detail about the circumstances of the 175 people killed.
05:39:01 <steven> because really there is a cast to be made that we should have evil alignments.
05:39:30 <steven> cast= case
05:39:40 <Mekkis> ah, I can believe that
05:40:06 <Mekkis> So, I currently have a Red Mantis Assassin in PFS. He's just reached sixth level.
05:40:21 <steven> well my Necromancer Ahtuz is in the party, he has gone evil like 5-6 times.
05:40:23 <Mekkis> (currently Inquisitor of Achaekek 5)
05:40:47 <steven> that a pretty feat intensive prestige class for an inquisitor to go into.
05:40:51 <Mekkis> So I was considering taking three levels of rogue, before continuing with Inquisitor
05:41:02 <Mekkis> steven, PFS: he won't be taking the prestige class
05:41:21 <steven> ah cool cool missed that.
05:41:52 <steven> um... if you were building him now i'd suggest taking the stygian slayer archetype of slayer.
05:42:06 <Mekkis> Ulzef has suggested that instead I should dip a level of swashbuckler and take Slashing Grace instead
05:42:40 <steven> archetype of inquisitor?
05:43:06 <Mekkis> none
05:43:24 <steven> alrighty...
05:44:35 <Mekkis> there is also some interesting rulesish stuff
05:44:55 <steven> rogue wouldnt be bad since there are teamwork feats that have to do with sneak attack.
05:45:18 <Mekkis> Can you take: Weapon Finesse, Slashing grace, and TWF at the same time with a sawtooth sabre?
05:45:28 <steven> yes.
05:45:29 <Mekkis> strictly speaking, with two sawtooth sabres?
05:45:47 <Mekkis> !feat weapon finesse
05:45:48 <diebot> Mekkis, WEAPON FINESSE [Combat] You are trained in using your agility in melee combat, as opposed to brute strength.
05:45:48 <diebot> Benefit: With a light weapon, rapier, whip, or spiked chain made for a creature of your size category, you may use your Dexterity modifier instead of your Strength modifier on attack rolls. If you carry a shield, its armor check penalty applies to your attack rolls.
05:45:48 <diebot> Special: Natural weapons are considered light weapons. Source: Core
05:46:27 <Mekkis> So weapon finesse only works with light weapons, right?
05:46:41 <Mekkis> Slashing grace only works with one-handed slashing weapons...
05:47:44 <steven> light weapons and weapons with the finesse special quality.
05:47:52 <steven> like rapier
05:48:24 <steven> yes slashing grace only works with One-Handed slashing weapons. not one handed light weapons.
05:49:01 <Mekkis> Sawtooth sabre doesn't have the Finesse special quality. However, the one printing of the sawtooth sabre notes that it IS a light weapon.
05:49:12 <Mekkis> except if you're nonproficient with it
05:49:59 <steven> no...
05:50:11 <steven> its treated as light for the purposes of two weapon fighting.
05:50:16 <steven> that does not make it a light weapon.
05:51:01 <steven> it is still a one handed weapon that is treated as a light weapon when two weapon fighting with it.
05:51:03 <Mekkis> So you're saying it's non-finessable?
05:51:25 <steven> Its one of those very wierd weapon that occasionally gets smacked by table variation.
05:51:51 <Mekkis> What if I told you that it's grandfathered in from the Pathfinder Chronicles Campaign Setting?
05:53:29 <Mekkis> Avatar, I was trying to find out how I could get more panache
05:53:56 <steven> i believe it still uses the entry from the inner sea world guide.
05:54:59 <steven> let me pull up my campaign setting.
05:55:09 <steven> look at the entry and see what they changed from that to the world guide.
05:56:16 <Mekkis> That's not what Additional Resources says:
05:56:33 <Mekkis> As of 3/7/11, the Pathfinder Chronicles Campaign Setting has been replaced by the Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Inner Sea World Guide. Equipment, feats, and prestige classes already in play remain legal, but no further equipment may be purchased from this book, nor may a character take a feat or the first level in a prestige class from this source when gaining a new level.
05:57:49 <steven> Any rules element which has been updated in the Inner Sea World Guide (as denoted with an asterisk below) MUST use the version in the World Guide. If the updated version of a feat has prerequisites you no longer meet, you may ignore those prerequisites.
05:58:15 <steven> Equipment: wayfinder, all weapons on page 209, all armor on page 211 (except the armored kilt), all gear on page 213*;
05:58:27 <Mekkis> that * is referring to the gear
05:59:26 <Mekkis> So: Should I just take a level of swashbuckler and slashing grace to avoid any potential table variation?
05:59:58 <steven> wont help if you have blades that were grandfathered in and not updated.
06:00:17 <steven> because slashing grace treats the old sawtooths as light weapons.
06:00:56 <Mekkis> but new sawtooths as one-handed piercing weapons, which Swashbuckler treats as finessable?
06:02:45 <steven> oh i thought you were talkin about going rogue.
06:03:25 <Mekkis> I was considering going rogue, but then Ulzef pointed me at swashbuckler. And now I'm looking at the relative merits of each
06:03:32 <steven> and new sawtooth abres are slashing.
06:04:06 <Mekkis> so are old ones, ja?
06:04:12 <steven> yup
06:05:25 <steven> have you enchanted your swords?
06:05:53 <Mekkis> does it matter?
06:07:00 <steven> well if you havent, you can just sell the grandfathered ones in, buy new ones, dip swashbuckler, take slashing grace and trolololol all the way to dex to damageville
06:07:43 <Mekkis> sounds like a Not Bad idea
06:08:11 <steven> and really it might just be a good plan anyways as its gonna cost you a total of 2335 to replace two +1 blades.
06:08:23 <steven> and you wont have any of these problems.
06:09:10 <Mekkis> The other alternative is to keep them as they are and take 3 rogue levels?
06:09:36 <steven> well the alternate isnt as effecient
06:10:21 <Mekkis> I know I'm losing 1BAB and 2 spellcasting levels in comparison, but I get 2d6 sneak attack and a talent
06:10:23 <Mekkis> right?
06:10:45 <steven> you lose 3 spellcasting levels to get 2d6 sneak.
06:11:37 <Mekkis> compared with taking the level of swashbuckler...
06:12:20 <steven> well 1 level of swashbuckler gets you +1 bab, derring-do, dodging panache, opportune parry and riposte
06:12:45 <steven> gets you swashbuckler finesse..
06:12:47 <Mekkis> my charisma modifier is negative
06:12:59 <steven> which is basically weapon finesse for free.
06:13:11 <steven> so you can retrain weapon finesse if you've already got it.
06:13:27 <Mekkis> just like the rogue levels
06:14:15 <steven> suppose so if you go with unchained rogue.
06:14:31 <steven> swashbuckler is also +1hp
06:14:38 <Mekkis> I'm definitely not going nonunchained rogue
06:14:38 <steven> brb, dogs gotta go to bathroom
06:27:04 <Steven> alright, now im goin to sleep. have fun guys, see ya later.
06:30:51 <steven> i swear she has an amazing talent for slipping her chain.
06:30:52 <Mekkis> dan
06:31:16 <steven> had to chase her around the yard because she thought it was a great game.
06:32:13 <Mekkis> fair enough. I can believe that
06:35:45 <steven> Its gonna be so insane once we get into the juicy parts of this story.
06:37:51 <Steven> bronchitis
06:38:11 <Mekkis> So how do you think the rogue plan compares against the swashbuckler plan?
06:38:43 <Steven> the only one i get sick of here is brunius
06:38:57 <Brunius_> wow
06:38:58 <steven> i think you'd be better served to go the swashbuckler route
06:39:04 <Brunius_> fine
06:39:05 <steven> and then you've 2 levels to play around with.
06:39:07 <Brunius_> I see how it is
06:39:12 <Steven> damn right you do!
06:39:17 <Steven> lol
06:39:21 <Mekkis> fair enough
06:40:49 <Mekkis> I suppose I can take a level of rogue later, if I really want: maybe they'll print an archetype that replaces Finesse :P
06:57:12 <steven> oh my god... i overpayed for my scroll of mind blank.
06:57:33 <steven> its only 3k i payed 6600 lol...
06:57:44 <steven> gotta refund me some money.
06:59:44 <steven> or just say i bought 2 of them and 600g works too
07:17:17 <Mekkis> !rng ltq ed
07:17:18 <diebot> Mekkis, ltq
07:32:00 <Avatar> I think you need a grit pool to begin with for that to work
07:32:15 <Avatar> my new char is a gunslinger/swashbuckler trying that trick
07:32:22 <Avatar> but y'know, without extra grit
07:32:26 <Mekkis> the grit pool and the panache pool are equivalent
07:32:40 <Mekkis> although I've found that 2, maybe 3 panache is all you need
07:34:43 <Avatar> !findchar pedro
07:34:51 <diebot> Avatar, Character: pedro.
07:35:01 <Avatar> die, bot
07:35:08 <Mekkis> how recent is that character
07:35:17 <Avatar> fairly recent but not really recent
07:35:54 <Avatar> http://www.pfrpg.com.au/viewchar.php5?char=1055
07:36:25 <Avatar> still a bit of a mess
07:37:35 <Mekkis> !findchar Pedro
07:37:40 <diebot> Mekkis, Character: Pedro. number: 1055( http://www.pfrpg.com.au/viewchar.php5?char=1055 )
07:38:30 <Mekkis> !history 1055
07:38:31 <diebot> Mekkis, r589 | vpsirc | 2015-03-18 00:11:29 -0400 (Wed, 18 Mar 2015) | 1 line
07:39:44 <Mekkis> I'm actually surprised that this script still works
07:39:53 <Mekkis> !findchar deceased
07:39:54 <diebot> Mekkis, Character: deceased.
07:39:56 <Mekkis> !findchar Deceased
07:39:57 <diebot> Mekkis, Character: Deceased. number: 285( http://www.pfrpg.com.au/viewchar.php5?char=285 )
07:40:00 <Mekkis> !history 285
07:40:01 <diebot> Mekkis, r41 | vpsirc | 2012-11-17 00:07:52 -0500 (Sat, 17 Nov 2012) | 1 line
07:40:02 <diebot> Mekkis, r18 | vpsirc | 2012-09-02 09:47:25 -0400 (Sun, 02 Sep 2012) | 1 line
07:40:02 <diebot> Mekkis, r3 | initial load | 2012-07-21 00:05:09 -0400 (Sat, 21 Jul 2012) | 1 line
07:40:24 <Mekkis> !findchar Buck
07:40:25 <diebot> Mekkis, Character: Buck. number: 308( http://www.pfrpg.com.au/viewchar.php5?char=308 ) number: 324( http://www.pfrpg.com.au/viewchar.php5?char=324 )
07:40:51 <Mekkis> isn't Buck 13 now?
07:40:56 <Avatar> yeap
07:40:59 <Avatar> that might not be updated
07:41:05 <Mekkis> !history 308
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r530 | vpsirc | 2014-12-19 00:11:05 -0500 (Fri, 19 Dec 2014) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r233 | vpsirc | 2013-08-25 00:10:31 -0400 (Sun, 25 Aug 2013) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r162 | vpsirc | 2013-06-01 00:09:54 -0400 (Sat, 01 Jun 2013) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r132 | vpsirc | 2013-04-25 00:12:14 -0400 (Thu, 25 Apr 2013) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r64 | vpsirc | 2013-01-28 00:18:10 -0500 (Mon, 28 Jan 2013) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r30 | vpsirc | 2012-10-04 00:10:34 -0400 (Thu, 04 Oct 2012) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r3 | initial load | 2012-07-21 00:05:09 -0400 (Sat, 21 Jul 2012) | 1 line
07:41:26 <Mekkis> !diff 308 r3
07:41:28 <diebot> Mekkis, File saved to http://nl.ti4200.info/vpsirc/sheets/diffs/308r3.txt
08:11:29 <Mekkis> !spell mind blank
08:11:32 <diebot> Mekkis, MIND BLANK abjuration ([]) sorcerer/wizard 8, witch 8 1 standard action Range: close (25 ft. + 5 ft./2 levels) one creature Comp: V, S Duration: 24 hours Save: Will negates (harmless) SR:yes (harmless)Source: PFRPG Core
08:11:32 <diebot> The subject is protected from all devices and spells that gather information about the target through divination magic (such as detect evil, locate creature, scry, and see invisible). This spell also grants a +8 resistance bonus on saving throws against all mindaffecting spells and effects. Mind blank even foils limited wish, miracle, and wish
08:11:32 <diebot> spells when they are used in such a way as to gain information about the target. In the case of scrying that scans an area the creature is in, such as arcane eye, the spell works but the creature simply isn't detected. Scrying attempts that are targeted specifically at the subject do not work at all.
08:11:45 <Mekkis> just pay for a spellcasting service
09:16:19 <Avatar> michael g might play a game online
09:36:03 Avatar` ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
09:36:49 Avatar has quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
10:19:02 Gamera ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
10:25:16 Gamera has quit (Quit: )
10:34:23 Gamera ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
11:10:12 Steven1 has quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
11:28:32 <Mekkis>
11:32:33 Steven1 ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
11:32:33 Steven1 is now known as steven
11:34:45 steven is now known as Steven1
12:21:58 Topic for #d&d is: PFS: TBA || WotW: TBA || All topic times are AEST (UTC+10:00); set your timezone on the site to see your local times in the Schedule! | Pathfinder Online http://www.pfrpg.com.au
12:21:58 Topic for #d&d set by Avatar at Sun Apr 5 08:23:43 2015
12:21:58 <***> Buffer Playback...
12:21:58 <***> Playback Complete.
14:48:32 <Steven1> !roll 40d6
14:48:52 <Steven1> !throw 40d6
14:48:52 <diebot> Steven1, 40d6: [40d6=6,3,4,1,3,3,4,6,6,4,4,4,6,4,2,2,2,5,2,1,3,6,3,1,4,5,1,2,3,6,5,2,3,2,1,4,4,3,4,2] 136
15:57:19 Steven1 has quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
16:40:10 Steven1 ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
16:40:10 Steven1 is now known as steven
16:42:24 steven is now known as Steven1
16:52:52 Steven1 is now known as steven
16:53:13 <steven> well... we are done.
16:54:04 <steven> mekkis... our game went off script... completely.
16:54:17 <steven> we fought a creature
16:54:43 <steven> open beastiary 4, turn to pag 261
16:54:47 <steven> page even
17:18:52 ulzef ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
17:49:10 <steven> need to find a 17th level caster feat.
18:01:08 <ulzef> what type of caster and what feats do you already have?
18:03:12 <steven> necromancer, lots of stupid stuff that gives me +2 CL +2 DC necromancy spells, Spell perfection suffocation
18:04:01 <ulzef> eh no idea then
18:04:23 <steven> my dc for it is anywhere between 32 and 38
18:04:40 <steven> because its my main, i need you to die right now spell.
18:05:27 <steven> i think im mainly looking for something thats 'cool'
18:05:35 <steven> because that combo is already stupidly powerful.
18:12:38 <steven> i suffocated this tonight.
18:12:40 <steven> http://www.d20pfsrd.com/bestiary/monster-listings/outsiders/titan-fomorian
18:12:49 <steven> it surged and failed by 1.
18:23:39 <steven> I think i may be one of the smartest creatures in all of the universe.
18:23:46 <steven> my character mind you not me.
18:34:18 <steven> I match Baphomet's Int.
18:36:39 <steven> I know baba yaga is smarter by like 10 points i think.
18:36:48 <steven> it might be more...
18:36:52 <steven> shes awesome.
18:47:59 <steven> suppose i could get Spell Penetration.
18:48:36 <steven> greater spell penetration that is.
18:49:23 <steven> so... when rolling vs SR on necromancy spells I'd have a +27
18:49:45 <Steven> i feel human today.
18:50:24 <steven> dweomer's essence or a +32.
18:50:41 <steven> sorry on suffocation
18:51:02 <steven> all other necromancy spells +23
18:53:49 <steven> suppose i could just get prefered spell and just never actually prepare suffocation
18:53:57 <steven> and spontaneoously cast it
19:01:46 <Mekkis> bleh
19:02:01 <Mekkis> steven, you should obviously take the most broken feat for spellcasters
19:02:22 <steven> lets hear it
19:02:34 <phul> hey
19:03:09 <Mekkis> Sacred Geometry
19:03:27 <steven> no, that slows down the table and confuses GMs as to what it actually doe.
19:03:29 <steven> doe.
19:03:31 <steven> does
19:03:37 <Mekkis> no it doesn't
19:04:06 <Mekkis> !throw 15#1d6 aiming for 101,103,107
19:04:08 <diebot> Mekkis, aiming for 101,103,107: [1d6=1] 1, [1d6=5] 5, [1d6=6] 6, [1d6=4] 4, [1d6=2] 2, [1d6=6] 6, [1d6=5] 5, [1d6=3] 3, [1d6=5] 5, [1d6=4] 4, [1d6=3] 3, [1d6=4] 4, [1d6=1] 1, [1d6=1] 1, [1d6=6] 6
19:04:47 <steven> *I* know what the feat does, but when i tell a GM i'm going to use it he goes and looks it up to see what im doing.
19:04:53 <Mekkis> (6+4) * (6+4) + 1 + (1 - 1) * everything else
19:05:13 <steven> and then he sees that shit and i have to explain it.
19:06:29 <steven> seems like im slowing down the table more then i should.
19:08:05 <steven> If something needs to die that badly, free action recover a 1st level spell, Heightened Persistent suffocation DC38
19:08:40 <steven> damn he saved... use my staff of the master, quicken heightened persistent suffocation DC 38
19:09:32 <steven> prefered spell seems better and better.
19:09:44 <steven> that way i dont have to prep suffocations.
19:10:31 <steven> because vs undead its pretty meh.
19:11:44 <Mekkis> yeah, not a bad one. Not going the Spell Mastery chain?
19:12:37 <steven> do you mean spell perfection?
19:12:40 <Mekkis> yeah
19:13:18 <steven> yeah, spell perfection is on my suffocation
19:13:30 <Mekkis> What about Greater Spell Specialisation
19:13:46 <steven> yeah got all those
19:14:15 <Mekkis> !feat Preferred spell
19:14:17 <diebot> Mekkis, PREFERRED SPELL []Prereq: Spellcraft 5 ranks, Heighten Spell. You find it very easy to cast one particular spell.
19:14:17 <diebot> Benefit: Choose one spell which you have the ability to cast. You can cast that spell spontaneously by sacrificing a prepared spell or spell slot of equal or higher level. You can apply any metamagic feats you possess to this spell when you cast it. This increases the minimum level of the prepared spell or spell slot you must sacrifice in order
19:14:18 <diebot> to cast it but does not affect the casting time.
19:14:18 <diebot> Special: You can gain this feat multiple times. Its effects do not stack. Each time you take the feat, it applies to a different spell. Source: APG
19:14:29 <Mekkis> Doesn't Greater Spell Specialisation do the same thing?
19:15:50 <steven> oh, no i didnt get spell spec.
19:16:06 <steven> i was thinking greater spell focus.
19:16:32 <steven> i remember why i didnt take it, becaue suffocation has no level based variables.
19:16:51 <steven> so spell specialization only helps me bypass SR.
19:17:20 <steven> I have spell specialization for vampiric touch so i can slap people for 10d6
19:18:21 <steven> really though i should retrain that feat since I'm rocking a CL21 because level 17+2 necromancy spell+2Ruby phoenix
19:18:49 <steven> so... sounds like its time to spend 5 prestige and 850g.
19:22:20 <steven> so i guess i have greater spell penetration now
19:26:34 <steven> i guess horrid wilting as my 16th level school
19:26:40 <steven> spell i gotta pick
19:38:31 <Mekkis> vARISIAN tATTO?
19:38:36 <Mekkis> sorry caps
19:39:59 <steven> got it
19:40:21 <steven> spells are varisian tattoo
19:41:17 <steven> spell focus necro, greater spell focus necro, spell pen greater spell pen, bloatmage initiate, imp familiar, toughness, alertness, command undad, metamagic Bouncing, persistant, quicken, reach and spell perfection
19:41:24 <steven> sorry feats
19:42:04 <steven> like the combo is done... i can grab a litte bit of versatility now if i want... but so far nothing is really standing out.
19:42:32 <steven> what i really want sadly i am unable to get because its not pfs legal.
19:42:40 <steven> but thats a good thing..
19:44:27 <Mekkis> Evolved Familiar
19:44:53 <steven> I dont make cha requirement
19:45:22 <steven> ability scores 12/7/18/37/12/8
19:47:17 <steven> perhaps i should just upgrade to a +6 headband of mental perfection
19:47:28 <steven> would change it to 18 wis 14cha.
19:55:38 <steven> or... true sight goggles.
20:05:00 <ulzef> i thought you only really played ap's steven how do you have a lvl 17 fighting mythic things
20:05:18 <steven> we went off script
20:05:37 <ulzef> ah
20:07:03 <steven> what you need to take away from it is i killed a CR22/8MT creature single handedly with janky bullshit that when it showed up everyone at the table was like fuck... we're dead.
20:10:53 <steven> no but seriously, i cast the spell and everyone went quiet while the GM looked up some stuff, did some math, and then rolled 2 dice and hung his head in shame... and thena chorus of cheers went up.
20:21:04 <Mekkis> why do you care about PFS legality then?
20:24:33 <steven> just because another player/gm does something that isnt strictly legal doesnt mean i should do things that arent allowed.
20:25:37 <steven> miracle a greater planar binding to summon a creature that has 18HD and 8 mythic tiers... technically its got 18HD and so fits into the description of the spell.
20:27:46 <steven> i wouldnt ever do that, but I wasnt the GM.
20:30:02 <Mekkis> sure, but if you're not playing PFS, you're not bound by PFS
20:31:07 <steven> we were playing the AP as a module, so we were bound by PFS rules.
20:32:06 <Mekkis> ah
20:39:36 <Steven1> what up
20:48:16 <Mekkis> steven, I think the take-home message really is that your character is too adversarial towards the GM.
21:03:38 <Mekkis> enjoying? The first coffee my espresso machine has made in about a year
21:05:00 <Steven1> cool
21:25:04 <Avatar`> why a year
21:33:27 <Mekkis> The machine was in a drawer for a year
21:38:08 <Avatar> ops
22:06:18 <Mekkis> ops?
22:24:29 <Avatar> oops
23:00:49 <Mekkis> WOW
23:00:56 <Mekkis> An SKR quote I agree with!
23:01:11 <Mekkis> "News flash: the game is already stacked so you're expected to win. You don't have to abuse the system to ensure it. "
23:17:44 <Avatar`> is that really true though
23:17:52 Avatar` is now known as Avatar
23:20:39 <Mekkis> I haven't seen any evidence to the contrary
Search this day's buffer: