// #d&d — 2015-05-09
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
00:12:46 <Akhaara> Ah it's midnight here lol. I didn't remember the time difference comparison but remembered early in the morning (late) was when avatar said he woke up recently lol
00:18:39 <Brunius|M> !throw 1d2
00:18:40 <diebot> Brunius|M, 1d2: [1d2=1] 1
00:19:18 <s_gmusic> 2300 for me. one of the aussie zones is 1400
00:26:59 <Steven> alrighty, been awake for a couple hours.. i think its time for a nap.
01:17:59 <Avatar> were you not sure how extra grit works
01:30:42 ulzef ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
01:31:49 Gamera has quit (Quit: )
01:37:32 <Steven> i didnt make it to sleep.
02:18:14 ulzef has quit (Quit: )
03:19:08 <Avatar`> sleeping is easy
03:27:51 <Steven> suppose so.
03:28:54 <Avatar> where's your confidence
03:39:38 <Avatar> hello phul I am zuul
03:44:57 <Avatar> did you win
03:46:08 <Avatar> s_g: the answer to that question is never "no" and nothing else
03:58:21 <Steven> sup
03:58:57 <Avatar> where 'ave you been
03:59:09 <Avatar> I knew something was missing in here
03:59:14 <Avatar> couldn't quite place my finger on it
04:17:52 <Steven> meh
04:30:42 <Mekkis> You might be missing one thing: the concept of "A4" and "A3" might be foreign (pun intended) to the US audience.
04:33:57 <Mekkis> Steven, did you chase the Brune away?!
04:33:59 <Mekkis> :'(
04:34:11 <Steven> sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.
04:34:23 <Steven> plus he knows i was foolin
04:34:35 <Steven> sorry man, i have been pretty sick.
04:34:36 <Mekkis> )':
04:46:36 <Mekkis> Brunius!!
04:46:45 <Brunius> what
04:46:48 <Steven> see
04:47:10 <Brunius> fuck you steve
04:47:16 <Steven> heh
04:47:53 <Steven> gettin so much milage out of that.
05:04:19 <Mekkis> ulzef, yeah, but I need to weigh it up against taking inquisitor levels
05:10:41 <Brunius> tashes, you reckon TPG is beyond useless for internet, right?
05:10:41 <Brunius> wait
05:10:46 <Brunius> tashes doesn't hang out in here regularly
05:10:51 <Brunius> she was having issues with TPG yeah?
05:12:49 <diebot> just fyi, Brunius does have access to my logs. He sees all this stuff.
05:13:04 <Brunius> avatar, how's iinet?
05:13:59 <Mekkis> iinet is great
05:14:06 <Mekkis> They're my provider at the moment
05:14:12 <Mekkis> but yeah. TPG sucks
05:15:09 <Mekkis> I should start being more serious at playing the Creditcard game
05:18:00 <Steven> thats cool.
05:21:08 <Avatar> what's wrong
05:21:14 <Avatar> sick of mekkis ?
05:21:26 <Brunius> it's looking like iinet will be the best options
05:22:15 <Brunius> complicated by needing a 6mo contract but they're still looking good
05:39:25 <Mekkis> considered internode, Brunius ¿
05:39:25 <Mekkis> ?
05:39:39 <Brunius> They're who we're currently with, but don't seem to have competitive prices
05:41:40 <Mekkis> fair enough, I guess
05:42:05 s_gmusic has quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
05:46:19 Andros414 ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
05:46:35 Andros414 is now known as s_gmusic
05:53:29 <Mekkis> Avatar, I was trying to find out how I could get more panache
06:27:04 <Steven> alright, now im goin to sleep. have fun guys, see ya later.
06:30:52 <Mekkis> dan
06:37:51 <Steven> bronchitis
06:38:43 <Steven> the only one i get sick of here is brunius
06:38:57 <Brunius_> wow
06:39:04 <Brunius_> fine
06:39:07 <Brunius_> I see how it is
06:39:12 <Steven> damn right you do!
06:39:17 <Steven> lol
07:05:35 <Mekkis> I'm currently with iinet, Brunius`
07:17:17 <Mekkis> !rng ltq ed
07:17:18 <diebot> Mekkis, ltq
07:27:12 <ulzef> iinet are fairly good except there phone customer service
07:28:05 <ulzef> and are you going full Inq?
07:29:18 <ulzef> the 3 lvl rogue dip gets you a talent,evasion,weapon finesse and get to use dex as well as 2d6 sneak
07:30:20 <ulzef> 4th lvl is pretty good as well
07:31:48 <ulzef> i did notice no wear did it say they don't get dex and half with say a elven curve blade
07:32:00 <Avatar> I think you need a grit pool to begin with for that to work
07:32:15 <Avatar> my new char is a gunslinger/swashbuckler trying that trick
07:32:22 <Avatar> but y'know, without extra grit
07:32:26 <Mekkis> the grit pool and the panache pool are equivalent
07:32:40 <Mekkis> although I've found that 2, maybe 3 panache is all you need
07:34:43 <Avatar> !findchar pedro
07:34:51 <diebot> Avatar, Character: pedro.
07:35:01 <Avatar> die, bot
07:35:08 <Mekkis> how recent is that character
07:35:17 <Avatar> fairly recent but not really recent
07:35:54 <Avatar> http://www.pfrpg.com.au/viewchar.php5?char=1055
07:36:25 <Avatar> still a bit of a mess
07:37:35 <Mekkis> !findchar Pedro
07:37:40 <diebot> Mekkis, Character: Pedro. number: 1055( http://www.pfrpg.com.au/viewchar.php5?char=1055 )
07:38:30 <Mekkis> !history 1055
07:38:31 <diebot> Mekkis, r589 | vpsirc | 2015-03-18 00:11:29 -0400 (Wed, 18 Mar 2015) | 1 line
07:39:44 <Mekkis> I'm actually surprised that this script still works
07:39:53 <Mekkis> !findchar deceased
07:39:54 <diebot> Mekkis, Character: deceased.
07:39:56 <Mekkis> !findchar Deceased
07:39:57 <diebot> Mekkis, Character: Deceased. number: 285( http://www.pfrpg.com.au/viewchar.php5?char=285 )
07:40:00 <Mekkis> !history 285
07:40:01 <diebot> Mekkis, r41 | vpsirc | 2012-11-17 00:07:52 -0500 (Sat, 17 Nov 2012) | 1 line
07:40:02 <diebot> Mekkis, r18 | vpsirc | 2012-09-02 09:47:25 -0400 (Sun, 02 Sep 2012) | 1 line
07:40:02 <diebot> Mekkis, r3 | initial load | 2012-07-21 00:05:09 -0400 (Sat, 21 Jul 2012) | 1 line
07:40:24 <Mekkis> !findchar Buck
07:40:25 <diebot> Mekkis, Character: Buck. number: 308( http://www.pfrpg.com.au/viewchar.php5?char=308 ) number: 324( http://www.pfrpg.com.au/viewchar.php5?char=324 )
07:40:51 <Mekkis> isn't Buck 13 now?
07:40:56 <Avatar> yeap
07:40:59 <Avatar> that might not be updated
07:41:05 <Mekkis> !history 308
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r530 | vpsirc | 2014-12-19 00:11:05 -0500 (Fri, 19 Dec 2014) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r233 | vpsirc | 2013-08-25 00:10:31 -0400 (Sun, 25 Aug 2013) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r162 | vpsirc | 2013-06-01 00:09:54 -0400 (Sat, 01 Jun 2013) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r132 | vpsirc | 2013-04-25 00:12:14 -0400 (Thu, 25 Apr 2013) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r64 | vpsirc | 2013-01-28 00:18:10 -0500 (Mon, 28 Jan 2013) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r30 | vpsirc | 2012-10-04 00:10:34 -0400 (Thu, 04 Oct 2012) | 1 line
07:41:07 <diebot> Mekkis, r3 | initial load | 2012-07-21 00:05:09 -0400 (Sat, 21 Jul 2012) | 1 line
07:41:26 <Brunius`> so I'm making a character for a mate's wilderness campaign
07:41:26 <Mekkis> !diff 308 r3
07:41:28 <diebot> Mekkis, File saved to http://nl.ti4200.info/vpsirc/sheets/diffs/308r3.txt
07:41:35 <Brunius`> I'm thinking ranger, guide and skirmisher archetypes
07:44:00 <ulzef> what you wanting from ranger?
07:44:12 <Brunius`> wilderness-y things
07:44:18 <Brunius`> I also considered fighter
07:44:29 <ulzef> because there are alot of better options for most ranger stuff
07:44:52 <ulzef> what sort of ranger?
07:46:13 <ulzef> combat style? is there likely to be a favored enemy that is awesome for the game?
07:47:26 <Brunius`> elf may be helpful
07:49:45 <ulzef> hunter has alot of the awesome with a really good animal companion. Druid with a ranger splash + feat gets full favored enemy. the druid option also gets awesome wildshaping and pretty much full spells
07:53:46 <Mekkis> ulzef, the character I have is a red mantis assassin
07:54:00 <Mekkis> so far, he's Inquisitor 5 of Acheakek
07:54:27 <ulzef> guessing you already have the slashing grace investment then?
07:54:40 <Mekkis> I don't actually
07:54:53 <Mekkis> !feat slashing grace
07:54:55 <diebot> Mekkis, PASSING TRICK [Combat] Slipping past a foe gives you the chance to feint. Prerequisites: Int 13, Combat Expertise, Dodge, Improved Feint, Mobility, size Small or smaller. Benefit: Whenever you make a successful Acrobatics check to move through an opponent's space, you can spend a swift action to make a Bluff check against that opponent to
07:54:55 <diebot> feint in combat. Special: If you have the Underfoot feat and the opponent is larger than you, you gain a +2 bonus on the Bluff check this feat allows.
07:54:55 <diebot> Benefit: Source: UC
07:55:31 <Mekkis> oh
07:55:52 <Mekkis> no, I don't
07:58:25 <ulzef> i would just take the feat, the sabres are 1 handed finesseable slashing weapons right?
08:00:07 <Mekkis> sort of
08:00:15 <Mekkis> they're considered light weapons for me
08:00:24 <Mekkis> because of the particular sabres I picked up
08:01:15 <ulzef> hmmm would have to have the actual text in front of me not sure how it works with them being treated as light weapons
08:03:26 <Mekkis> It's interesting
08:03:38 <Mekkis> it depends which version you're using
08:05:02 <Mekkis> ISWG and UE say:
08:05:18 <Mekkis> The signature weapon of certain assassin cults, the sawtooth sabre is a cruelly efficient weapon. You may use a sawtooth sabre as a Martial Weapon (in which case it functions identically to a longsword). If you have the Exotic Weapon Proficiency (sawtooth sabre) feat, for the purpose of two-weapon fighting you can treat it as a light melee weapon; for all other purposes it is one-handed melee weapon.
08:06:15 <Mekkis> Campaign Setting (retired now) and Adventurer's Armoury (still legal) says: Sawtooth Sabre: The signature weapons of the
08:06:15 <Mekkis> notorious Red Mantis, sawtooth sabres are cruel but
08:06:15 <Mekkis> efficient weapons. Their curved, serrated blades are
08:06:15 <Mekkis> capable of making deep wounds and in the hands of
08:06:15 <Mekkis> a skilled user are treated as light weapons. A character
08:06:16 <Mekkis> without Exotic Weapon Proficiency (sawtooth sabre)
08:06:18 <Mekkis> can wield one of these weapons as a longsword.
08:13:37 <Mekkis> I'm using the AA version
08:23:49 Steven has quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
08:24:57 <Mekkis> Not sure if I can really get the best of both worlds
08:26:18 <Avatar> er, really?
08:26:43 <Avatar> s_gmusic can you confirm that
08:29:04 <Mekkis> what confirmation do you need, Avatar ?
08:36:53 <ulzef> its only light for the purpose of 2 weapon fighting so i think it works
08:43:32 <Mekkis> Meaning you can't finesse it, ja?
08:44:18 <ulzef> not without one lvl of swashbuckler
08:44:41 <Mekkis> so you're suggesting dipping swashbuckler instead?
08:44:44 <ulzef> but 1 lvl of swashbuckler + slashing grace is better than 3 lvls of rogue
08:46:20 <Mekkis> I suppose so. Also saves me $10 :P
08:46:37 Gamera ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
08:46:37 <ulzef> lol yeah
08:53:00 <ulzef> you have weapon focus in the saw tooth already right
08:58:15 <Mekkis> I think so: otherwise it's pretty trivial to retrain weapon finesse into it
08:58:17 <Mekkis> ulzef, can you help me weigh up the benefits and costs with taking three levels of rogue on my inquisitor?
08:58:45 <ulzef> well swash buckler gives you finesse for free anyway
08:59:28 <Mekkis> yah
09:00:05 <Mekkis> any archetypes that use wisdom instead of charisma?
09:01:28 <ulzef> not that i am aware of
09:04:56 s_gmusic has quit (*.net *.split)
09:04:56 Avatar has quit (*.net *.split)
09:04:56 Whitey has quit (*.net *.split)
09:04:56 Ballig has quit (*.net *.split)
09:06:13 Ballig ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
09:06:13 Whitey ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
09:06:13 Avatar ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
09:06:13 s_gmusic ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
09:06:20 ChanOP gives channel operator status to Avatar
09:22:10 Steven ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
09:22:10 Steven is now known as steven
09:22:34 steven has quit (EOF from client)
09:45:33 <Mekkis> !feat extra grit
09:45:34 <diebot> Mekkis, EXTRA GRIT [Grit] You have more grit than the ordinary gunslinger. Prerequisites: Grit class feature or the Amateur Gunslinger feat. Benefit: You gain 2 extra grit points at the start of each day, and your maximum grit increases by 2. Normal: If you are a gunslinger, you gain your Wisdom modifier in grit points at the start of each day,
09:45:34 <diebot> which is also your maximum grit. If you have the Amateur Gunslinger feat, you gain 1 grit point at the start of each day, and your maximum grit is equal to your Wisdom modifier. Special: If you possess levels in the gunslinger class, you can take this feat multiple times.
09:45:34 <diebot> Benefit: Source: UC
10:08:02 <m3gagl1tch> Hey guys, knew to pathfinder, have a charcter made up using my original gms system (20 point buy) anyone willing to look over it for me?
10:08:07 <m3gagl1tch> new*
10:28:23 steven ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
10:30:30 steven is now known as Steven1
10:31:44 Avatar` ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
10:33:35 Avatar has quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
10:37:52 <Steven1> what up
10:50:17 <Avatar> hi m3gagl1tch I can help you, show me your sheet
11:01:54 <Mekkis> enjoying? The first coffee my espresso machine has made in about a year
11:03:16 <Steven1> cool
11:13:22 Steven1 has quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
11:23:20 <Avatar`> why a year
11:23:24 Avatar` is now known as Avatar
11:31:42 <Mekkis> The machine was in a drawer for a year
11:36:24 <Avatar> ops
12:04:33 <Mekkis> ops?
12:17:03 <s_gmusic> confirm what?
12:22:45 <Avatar> oops
12:47:00 Topic for #d&d is: PFS: TBA || WotW: TBA || All topic times are AEST (UTC+10:00); set your timezone on the site to see your local times in the Schedule! | Pathfinder Online http://www.pfrpg.com.au
12:47:00 Topic for #d&d set by Avatar at Sun Apr 5 08:23:43 2015
12:47:00 <***> Buffer Playback...
12:47:00 <***> Playback Complete.
12:47:32 Steven1 ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
12:47:32 Steven1 is now known as steven
12:49:49 steven is now known as Steven1
13:13:47 Steven1 has quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
16:23:53 <Avatar> this: <Mekkis> You might be missing one thing: the concept of "A4" and "A3" might be foreign (pun intended) to the US audience.
17:24:44 <s_gmusic> oh, paper sizes
17:25:01 <s_gmusic> not typically known, no, unless you do art or something
17:25:02 <s_gmusic> ┐(￣ー￣)┌
17:57:22 <Avatar> what do you normally use for paper sizes
17:57:40 <Avatar> like if you're using a photocopier
18:04:54 <s_gmusic> A4
18:05:08 <s_gmusic> 8.5" x 11"
18:23:18 <Avatar> are all paper sizes only mentioned in inches
18:26:09 <Mekkis> it's normally termed "US Letter"
18:31:07 Steven1 ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
18:31:08 Steven1 is now known as steven
18:31:41 <s_gmusic> ^
18:31:58 <s_gmusic> murican size, murican measurement. :/
18:32:26 <steven> so first part of the game seems to be going really quite well...
18:36:00 <Avatar> okay I'll deal with that one later
18:49:45 <Steven> i feel human today.
19:02:34 <phul> hey
19:06:17 <steven> 51/64 spells left.
19:25:46 <Mekkis> which game?
19:33:58 <steven> part 5 of Reign of Winter.
19:34:20 <steven> 12 rounds of combat...
19:34:33 <steven> we've killed approdimently 175 people.
19:35:36 <steven> there have been 2 earthquake spells and a stampeed of 10 ankylosaurus
19:35:59 <Mekkis> ah. Please don't go into more detail: I'm still in the second book :)
19:36:34 <Mekkis> Can you help me decide which direction I should take my red mantis assassin?
19:36:53 <steven> i wont go into any detail about the circumstances of the 175 people killed.
19:37:17 <steven> because really there is a cast to be made that we should have evil alignments.
19:37:45 <steven> cast= case
19:37:55 <Mekkis> ah, I can believe that
19:38:21 <Mekkis> So, I currently have a Red Mantis Assassin in PFS. He's just reached sixth level.
19:38:37 <steven> well my Necromancer Ahtuz is in the party, he has gone evil like 5-6 times.
19:38:39 <Mekkis> (currently Inquisitor of Achaekek 5)
19:39:03 <steven> that a pretty feat intensive prestige class for an inquisitor to go into.
19:39:06 <Mekkis> So I was considering taking three levels of rogue, before continuing with Inquisitor
19:39:17 <Mekkis> steven, PFS: he won't be taking the prestige class
19:39:36 <steven> ah cool cool missed that.
19:40:07 <steven> um... if you were building him now i'd suggest taking the stygian slayer archetype of slayer.
19:40:21 <Mekkis> Ulzef has suggested that instead I should dip a level of swashbuckler and take Slashing Grace instead
19:40:56 <steven> archetype of inquisitor?
19:41:21 <Mekkis> none
19:41:39 <steven> alrighty...
19:42:51 <Mekkis> there is also some interesting rulesish stuff
19:43:10 <steven> rogue wouldnt be bad since there are teamwork feats that have to do with sneak attack.
19:43:33 <Mekkis> Can you take: Weapon Finesse, Slashing grace, and TWF at the same time with a sawtooth sabre?
19:43:44 <steven> yes.
19:43:44 <Mekkis> strictly speaking, with two sawtooth sabres?
19:44:02 <Mekkis> !feat weapon finesse
19:44:03 <diebot> Mekkis, WEAPON FINESSE [Combat] You are trained in using your agility in melee combat, as opposed to brute strength.
19:44:04 <diebot> Benefit: With a light weapon, rapier, whip, or spiked chain made for a creature of your size category, you may use your Dexterity modifier instead of your Strength modifier on attack rolls. If you carry a shield, its armor check penalty applies to your attack rolls.
19:44:04 <diebot> Special: Natural weapons are considered light weapons. Source: Core
19:44:43 <Mekkis> So weapon finesse only works with light weapons, right?
19:44:56 <Mekkis> Slashing grace only works with one-handed slashing weapons...
19:46:00 <steven> light weapons and weapons with the finesse special quality.
19:46:07 <steven> like rapier
19:46:40 <steven> yes slashing grace only works with One-Handed slashing weapons. not one handed light weapons.
19:47:16 <Mekkis> Sawtooth sabre doesn't have the Finesse special quality. However, the one printing of the sawtooth sabre notes that it IS a light weapon.
19:47:27 <Mekkis> except if you're nonproficient with it
19:48:15 <steven> no...
19:48:27 <steven> its treated as light for the purposes of two weapon fighting.
19:48:32 <steven> that does not make it a light weapon.
19:49:17 <steven> it is still a one handed weapon that is treated as a light weapon when two weapon fighting with it.
19:49:18 <Mekkis> So you're saying it's non-finessable?
19:49:41 <steven> Its one of those very wierd weapon that occasionally gets smacked by table variation.
19:50:07 <Mekkis> What if I told you that it's grandfathered in from the Pathfinder Chronicles Campaign Setting?
19:52:11 <steven> i believe it still uses the entry from the inner sea world guide.
19:53:15 <steven> let me pull up my campaign setting.
19:53:25 <steven> look at the entry and see what they changed from that to the world guide.
19:54:31 <Mekkis> That's not what Additional Resources says:
19:54:48 <Mekkis> As of 3/7/11, the Pathfinder Chronicles Campaign Setting has been replaced by the Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Inner Sea World Guide. Equipment, feats, and prestige classes already in play remain legal, but no further equipment may be purchased from this book, nor may a character take a feat or the first level in a prestige class from this source when gaining a new level.
19:56:05 <steven> Any rules element which has been updated in the Inner Sea World Guide (as denoted with an asterisk below) MUST use the version in the World Guide. If the updated version of a feat has prerequisites you no longer meet, you may ignore those prerequisites.
19:56:30 <steven> Equipment: wayfinder, all weapons on page 209, all armor on page 211 (except the armored kilt), all gear on page 213*;
19:56:42 <Mekkis> that * is referring to the gear
19:57:42 <Mekkis> So: Should I just take a level of swashbuckler and slashing grace to avoid any potential table variation?
19:58:14 <steven> wont help if you have blades that were grandfathered in and not updated.
19:58:32 <steven> because slashing grace treats the old sawtooths as light weapons.
19:59:11 <Mekkis> but new sawtooths as one-handed piercing weapons, which Swashbuckler treats as finessable?
20:01:00 <steven> oh i thought you were talkin about going rogue.
20:01:40 <Mekkis> I was considering going rogue, but then Ulzef pointed me at swashbuckler. And now I'm looking at the relative merits of each
20:01:48 <steven> and new sawtooth abres are slashing.
20:02:21 <Mekkis> so are old ones, ja?
20:02:27 <steven> yup
20:03:40 <steven> have you enchanted your swords?
20:04:08 <Mekkis> does it matter?
20:05:15 <steven> well if you havent, you can just sell the grandfathered ones in, buy new ones, dip swashbuckler, take slashing grace and trolololol all the way to dex to damageville
20:05:58 <Mekkis> sounds like a Not Bad idea
20:06:27 <steven> and really it might just be a good plan anyways as its gonna cost you a total of 2335 to replace two +1 blades.
20:06:38 <steven> and you wont have any of these problems.
20:07:25 <Mekkis> The other alternative is to keep them as they are and take 3 rogue levels?
20:07:51 <steven> well the alternate isnt as effecient
20:08:37 <Mekkis> I know I'm losing 1BAB and 2 spellcasting levels in comparison, but I get 2d6 sneak attack and a talent
20:08:38 <Mekkis> right?
20:09:01 <steven> you lose 3 spellcasting levels to get 2d6 sneak.
20:09:52 <Mekkis> compared with taking the level of swashbuckler...
20:10:36 <steven> well 1 level of swashbuckler gets you +1 bab, derring-do, dodging panache, opportune parry and riposte
20:11:01 <steven> gets you swashbuckler finesse..
20:11:03 <Mekkis> my charisma modifier is negative
20:11:15 <steven> which is basically weapon finesse for free.
20:11:26 <steven> so you can retrain weapon finesse if you've already got it.
20:11:42 <Mekkis> just like the rogue levels
20:12:30 <steven> suppose so if you go with unchained rogue.
20:12:46 <steven> swashbuckler is also +1hp
20:12:54 <Mekkis> I'm definitely not going nonunchained rogue
20:12:54 <steven> brb, dogs gotta go to bathroom
20:29:07 <steven> i swear she has an amazing talent for slipping her chain.
20:29:31 <steven> had to chase her around the yard because she thought it was a great game.
20:30:29 <Mekkis> fair enough. I can believe that
20:34:01 <steven> Its gonna be so insane once we get into the juicy parts of this story.
20:36:27 <Mekkis> So how do you think the rogue plan compares against the swashbuckler plan?
20:37:13 <steven> i think you'd be better served to go the swashbuckler route
20:37:20 <steven> and then you've 2 levels to play around with.
20:37:37 <Mekkis> fair enough
20:39:04 <Mekkis> I suppose I can take a level of rogue later, if I really want: maybe they'll print an archetype that replaces Finesse :P
20:39:36 <Steven1> what up
20:55:28 <steven> oh my god... i overpayed for my scroll of mind blank.
20:55:49 <steven> its only 3k i payed 6600 lol...
20:56:00 <steven> gotta refund me some money.
20:58:00 <steven> or just say i bought 2 of them and 600g works too
21:03:38 <Mekkis> enjoying? The first coffee my espresso machine has made in about a year
21:05:00 <Steven1> cool
21:25:04 <Avatar`> why a year
21:33:27 <Mekkis> The machine was in a drawer for a year
21:38:08 <Avatar> ops
22:06:18 <Mekkis> ops?
22:08:13 <Akhaara> Hey guys anyone here?
22:09:44 <Mekkis> !spell mind blank
22:09:47 <diebot> Mekkis, MIND BLANK abjuration ([]) sorcerer/wizard 8, witch 8 1 standard action Range: close (25 ft. + 5 ft./2 levels) one creature Comp: V, S Duration: 24 hours Save: Will negates (harmless) SR:yes (harmless)Source: PFRPG Core
22:09:48 <diebot> The subject is protected from all devices and spells that gather information about the target through divination magic (such as detect evil, locate creature, scry, and see invisible). This spell also grants a +8 resistance bonus on saving throws against all mindaffecting spells and effects. Mind blank even foils limited wish, miracle, and wish
22:09:48 <diebot> spells when they are used in such a way as to gain information about the target. In the case of scrying that scans an area the creature is in, such as arcane eye, the spell works but the creature simply isn't detected. Scrying attempts that are targeted specifically at the subject do not work at all.
22:10:00 <Mekkis> just pay for a spellcasting service
22:24:29 <Avatar> oops
22:29:58 <s_gmusic> No.
23:12:43 <Akhaara> Ah okay
23:14:34 <Avatar> michael g might play a game online
23:43:46 Gamera has quit (*.net *.split)
23:43:47 steven has quit (*.net *.split)
23:48:40 Gamera ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
23:48:40 steven ([email protected]) has joined #d&d
23:56:30 <ulzef> sorry only just saw the question mekkis 3 lvls unchained rogue is actually fair amazing
23:57:08 <ulzef> hi Akhaara most of the regualrs are probably at work or school
Search this day's buffer: